What Financial Advisors Actually Say About Whole Life (And What They Get Wrong)

What happens when you bring up whole life insurance to a financial advisor?

You’re about to find out.

A few months ago, I posted about IBC on LinkedIn. The response was immediate and intense — five hours of back-and-forth debate with multiple credentialed financial advisors. CFPs. CIMAs. Investment managers. Fee-only planners.

These aren’t random internet trolls. These are professionals with letters after their names, managing millions in client assets.

And every single objection they raised was wrong on the mechanics.

Not wrong on philosophy. Not wrong on priorities. Wrong on how the product actually works.

This isn’t speculation about what advisors think. This is what they actually said — their exact words — and how each objection was addressed with mechanics, not marketing.

Objection 1: “You’re Borrowing Your Own Money at Egregious Rates”

“A bank loans you money that’s not yours at competitive rates, a whole life policy loans you, your own money, at egregious rates.” — James W., CIMA®, CRPC®

This is the most common misconception about policy loans, and it’s worth correcting.

You’re not borrowing your own money.

When you take a policy loan, the insurance company lends you money from their general fund. The death benefit is the collateral — it’s how the insurance company knows they’ll be repaid no matter what. Your cash value determines how much of that collateral they’ll let you access.

Meanwhile, your cash value stays in the policy — it doesn’t move. It continues earning its guaranteed rate and participating in dividends. The insurance company’s money goes into your hands. Your capital stays put and keeps compounding.

This is mechanically identical to how a home equity line of credit works. You’re not “borrowing your own equity” — the bank lends you their money, secured by your home’s value. Same principle.

The difference is that with a policy loan, the lender also guarantees the collateral, the terms can’t change, no one can call the loan, and you typically get your money in 3-5 business days without a credit check.

On “egregious rates”: Policy loan interest rates are typically 5-6% — fixed and contractual. Compare that to the current average auto loan (7.1%), credit card (21%+), or commercial line of credit.

Here’s what changes the math entirely: while you’re paying 5% to the insurance company, your cash value is still earning interest and dividends inside the policy. That interest flows to the insurance company’s general fund, which benefits all policyholders through stronger dividend performance. The net cost of the loan is often under 1-2%.

Find me a bank that lends at a net cost of 1-2% with no credit check, no application, and no risk of the loan being called.

Objection 2: “Dividends Are Just a Return of Overpayment on Premiums”

“Dividends are not guaranteed — and also simply a return of over payment on premiums.” — James W.

This claim tells me the most about where understanding stops.

The IRS classifies dividends as a “return of premium” for tax purposes — that’s a tax classification, not an economic description.

A dividend is a distribution of the mutual company’s divisible surplus, which comes from four sources:

1. Investment earnings above assumptions
2. Mortality experience better than projected
3. Operating expenses below budget
4. Lapsed policy reserves

You’re an owner of the company. The dividend is your share of the company’s surplus — the same way a credit union distributes surplus to members.

Calling it a “return of overpayment” conflates a tax label with an economic reality. Those are different things.

On dividend history: The companies we work with have paid dividends for 100+ consecutive years — through depressions, world wars, recessions, and pandemics. The surplus isn’t accidental. It’s engineered through conservative actuarial assumptions.

Objection 3: “Cost of Insurance Is Extremely High”

“Cost of insurance is extremely high… it shouldn’t be sold to those who won’t benefit from it. That’s most people.” — Scott M., CFEI®

The cost of insurance in a whole life policy is level and guaranteed. It’s the same when you’re 70 as when you’re 35. That’s the contract.

Compare this to universal life products, where the cost of insurance recalculates every year based on attained age — and it’s exponential. Policies that perform faithfully for 25+ years can collapse because the internal cost becomes a monster eating the account value from the inside.

On “high” costs: High compared to what? Term is cheaper because it expires. That’s the product working as designed. But “cheaper” and “better” aren’t the same thing.

The question is total cost over a lifetime. When you factor in the financing function, the uninterrupted compounding, and the death benefit that’s actually there at the end, the calculus changes for people who have the income to capitalize it.

On “most people can’t benefit”: Per FDIC data (2023), 3,500+ commercial banks hold $202.4 billion in bank-owned life insurance on their balance sheets. Banks use this product as a Tier 1 capital strategy.

If whole life were only appropriate in a few cases, the banking industry wouldn’t be holding a fifth of a trillion dollars in it.

Objection 4: “Let Insurance Be Insurance, Investments Be Investments”

“Let insurance be insurance, investments be investments, and banking be banking. No need to blend the different worlds.” — Matt S., CFP®

This assumes financial instruments should only serve one purpose. But that ignores how the most sophisticated balance sheets actually work.

Over 3,700 U.S. banks hold $200+ billion in Bank-Owned Life Insurance. They’re not confused about what life insurance is. They’re using it for exactly what I describe — warehousing capital, accessing liquidity, and capturing the spread.

When you capitalize a whole life policy and borrow against it, your cash value continues to compound — uninterrupted. You pay interest to the insurance company (which you partially own as a mutual policyholder), and you repay principal back into your own system. The capital never leaves. It recycles.

Over a lifetime, the average American pays 34.5 cents of every disposable dollar to interest. Not once — perpetually. The question isn’t “does whole life beat a bank loan on any single transaction?” It’s: what happens when you recapture that 34.5% across every major purchase for 30, 40, 50 years?

Objection 5: “BOLI Is Just for Insurance, Not Borrowing”

“Some banks hold cash value life insurance on key personnel for the INSURANCE, not the borrowing or lending capability.” — Matt S. (in follow-up)

This misses what’s actually on the books.

Banks hold $202.4 billion in cash surrender value on their balance sheets (FDIC, 2023), reported as an asset. And according to the Federal Reserve’s own community banking primer, there are two ways to extract liquidity before death of the insured: surrender the policy or “borrow against the policy.”

Banks buy it primarily for the tax-free death benefit and to offset employee benefit costs. But they book the cash value as a growing, accessible asset.

Both things are true. They’re not buying it to be their own banker. But they’re absolutely treating it as accessible capital.

Objection 6: “Never Gonna Convince a Permanent-Life Salesman”

“Never gonna convince a cobbler that shoes are a bad product. Never gonna convince a permanent-life salesman that life insurance is a ripoff.” — Philip O., CFP®

A cobbler makes shoes. People need shoes. The question is whether you’re walking barefoot on principle or just mad at the cobbler.

This dismissal avoids engaging with the mechanics entirely. It’s easier to attack the messenger than address the message.

Here’s the actual question: If whole life insurance is such a terrible financial product, why did the government need to create MEC rules to stop wealthy people from using it as a tax shelter?

Before 1988, wealthy Americans discovered something financial advisors today seem to have forgotten: whole life insurance was the ultimate tax shelter. Single-premium policies allowed them to dump massive amounts into life insurance and access it tax-free through policy loans. The death benefit grew tax-free. The cash value grew tax-free. The access was tax-free.

Top wealth managers were telling millionaire clients to write single checks — $500,000, $1 million, whatever — and drop them into whole life policies. The tax benefits and control were so good that Congress had to pass the Technical Corrections Act of 1988 to stop it.

You can’t claim a product is universally terrible when Congress had to build a fence around it to stop rich people from stuffing their money into it.

Objection 7: “Net Cost 1-2% Ignores Policy Drag”

“The ‘net cost is only 1–2%’ claim ignores policy drag, dividend variability, and the risk of lapse and taxation if loans are mismanaged.” — James W.

“Policy drag” is not an actuarial term. It’s not in any contract, any illustration, or any regulatory filing. It’s a term used by critics to describe the fact that whole life has internal costs — mortality charges, expense loads, commissions.

Every financial product has costs. Mutual funds have expense ratios. Real estate has closing costs, maintenance, and property taxes.

The question isn’t whether costs exist — it’s whether the net result serves the client. In a properly designed IBC policy, cash value grows every single year without exception, the death benefit increases over time, and the policy owner has access to the most efficient credit instrument available to individuals.

Name another asset that provides: annual compounding, no mandatory repayment schedule, and a lender that guarantees the collateral.

Objection 8: “Risk of Lapse and Taxation if Mismanaged”

“Risk of lapse and taxation if loans are mismanaged.” — James W.

True. Also true of a mortgage if you stop making payments. Also true of a margin account if you ignore a margin call.

Every financial instrument can be mismanaged. That’s not an argument against the instrument — it’s an argument for working with someone who knows what they’re doing.

Properly managed IBC policies have an automatic premium loan provision that prevents lapse. This is standard practice.

Objection 9: “It’s a Sales Pitch, Not Education”

“None of this was education. All of it was a sales pitch.” — James W.

I’d call it a mechanical explanation of how policy loans actually work — because the objections raised were based on misunderstandings of the product structure.

Nelson Nash didn’t invent a sales pitch. He wrote a book explaining how the banking function works and how individuals can perform it themselves using a 200-year-old financial instrument that predates the income tax, the Federal Reserve, and the stock market.

Every claim I made about mechanics can be verified by reading any policy contract from a mutual company. The dividend history is public. The loan provisions are contractual. The tax treatment is established law.

That’s not sales. That’s documentation.

Objection 10: “90% of People Shouldn’t Have It”

“I would say it’s for a select group of people… It shouldn’t be sold to those who won’t benefit from it. That’s most people.” — Scott M.

The banking function isn’t niche — every person who finances a car, pays a mortgage, or uses a credit card is already banking. The only question is who controls it.

This product is appropriate for anyone with a need for finance during their lifetime and the discipline to capitalize a system. That’s not 3 cases. That’s most adults with consistent cash flow.

The real filter isn’t whether someone can benefit. It’s whether they have consistent cash flow and want to control the banking function in their lives. That describes every business owner, professional, and high-income earner who’s currently hemorrhaging interest to someone else’s banking system.

But here’s the economic reality advisors won’t tell you: they can’t earn ongoing fees from whole life insurance. Once you buy it, their revenue stream stops. Compare that to a managed portfolio where they earn 1-2% annually forever. Which product do you think they’ll recommend?

The Pattern Behind the Objections

These aren’t hypothetical objections from imaginary skeptics. These are real arguments from real credentialed professionals — and every single one revealed the same pattern.

Confidence without competence.

What struck me most about this exchange wasn’t the hostility (though there was plenty). It was the disconnect between confidence and competence.

Here are financial advisors with impressive credentials, managing millions in client assets, who fundamentally misunderstood how policy loans work. They were certain they were right. They were certain I was wrong.

And they were wrong about the basic mechanics of the product they were criticizing.

That should concern you.

Nelson Nash built the entire IBC framework around one question: “Compared to what?” Every financial decision exists in context. When an advisor tells you whole life is expensive, the question is: compared to what? When they say the returns are low, compared to what? When they claim policy loans are a bad deal, compared to what alternative for accessing capital?

The advisors in this thread couldn’t answer that question. They attacked the product without offering a superior alternative for the banking function. They criticized the mechanics without understanding them.

Not because financial advisors are bad people. Most aren’t. But because the incentive structures in their industry don’t reward understanding life insurance. They reward selling what they’re licensed to sell.

When someone steers you away from a product they don’t understand toward products they earn fees on, what exactly are they optimizing for?

What This Means for You

I’m not saying you should ignore your financial advisor’s counsel. I’m saying you should understand their limitations.

When they tell you whole life is a bad deal, ask them:

• Can you explain how policy loans actually work?
• How does annual compounding differ from monthly compounding?
• What’s the difference between cash value and the source of a policy loan?
• Why do banks hold $200+ billion in this “terrible” product?
• What’s your alternative for the banking function in my life?

If they can’t answer these questions accurately, their opinion on the product isn’t worth much.

Here’s what I learned from five hours of debate with credentialed professionals: expertise in one area doesn’t transfer to another. A CFP who manages stock portfolios isn’t automatically qualified to evaluate whole life insurance mechanics. The letters after someone’s name tell you what they studied, not what they understand.

Think for yourself. Do the reading. Becoming Your Own Banker is 97 pages. You can read it in an afternoon and understand more about this product than most financial advisors ever will.

The banking function touches every major purchase in your life. The question isn’t whether you need financing — it’s who controls it. When you understand the mechanics, you can make an informed choice.

Because the choice is always yours. Just make sure it’s actually informed.

---

In the next article, we’ll examine real policy illustrations — the actual numbers, costs, and benefits nobody shows you.

---

This is educational content only and not meant to serve as financial advice.